| 
|
08.17.06 |
| FOR
YOUR INFORMATION: The North Carolina Teacher Working Conditions Survey
In
2002 North Carolina became the first state to survey all of its teachers
on the conditions under which they work. The survey was developed after
extensive research by the North Carolina Professional Teaching Standards
Commission (NCPTSC) to identify the areas which most affected the work
of teachers and were most likely to get teachers to remain in teaching
and ensure high achievement for all students.
The
five domains NCPTSC identified – leadership, professional development,
time, facilities and resources, and empowerment – are the same five still
used to assess working conditions in North Carolina and also in other
districts and states around the country which have adopted our state’s
model.
The
survey has now been conducted three times in North Carolina, most recently
in spring of 2006, with school, district and state-level data providing
vital knowledge on the environments in which our teachers work every day.
As Governor Mike Easley has said, “Teacher working conditions are student
learning conditions.”
In
this edition of Wake FYI, we take a closer look at the North
Carolina Teacher Working Conditions Survey. |
| |
Why
Do a Survey of Teacher Working Conditions |
- Research
has shown that teachers are the most important factor influencing student
learning. ( For more information, see the June
15 edition of Wake FYI on teaching quality.)
|
- Teacher turnover
is a tremendous problem in the United States, with more than 50 percent
of new teachers leaving the profession within five years.
|
- National research
data suggests that while compensation is important in recruiting and
retaining good teachers, it is not the only or even the most important
factor. The conditions under which teachers work can play a much more
vital role in their decision to remain in teaching. This is particularly
true for teachers in what are traditionally considered the most challenging
teaching situations, such as those who work in high poverty, urban schools.
|
- A 2001 study by
Richard Ingersoll of Harvard University examined the top reasons for
teacher dissatisfaction. His findings are shown below.
|
|
| |
| The
Basics on the North Carolina Teacher Working Conditions Survey |
- The survey is administered
every two years to all teachers and administrators in North Carolina
.
|
- The
first survey in 2002 was a paper and pencil survey; in 2004 the survey
was administered online for the first time.
|
- All
questions are multiple choice; the first survey had fewer than fifty
questions and the number has increased with each administration to allow
for more detailed data to be collected.
|
- The
majority of the survey questions have responses listed on a 1 to 5 Likert
scale. This allows respondents, for example, to express whether they
"Strongly Disagree" with a statement (a score of 1) up to
"Strongly Agree" (a score of 5).
|
- The
2006 survey contained questions in all five of the original working
conditions domains (leadership, professional development, time, facilities
and resources, and empowerment) as well as, for the first time, a section
on mentoring for new teachers.
|
- Each
domain is the compilation of questions all related to the same issues.
The time domain, for instance, deals with issues related to the amount
of time teachers have to plan, to work collaboratively with other teachers,
and to provide appropriate attention to individual students, as well
as the amount of time spent outside of the work day on both instructional
(grading and planning) and non-instructional (coaching teams or sponsoring
clubs) duties.
|
- The
survey is anonymous; participants are given a random code to access
the survey online and ensure the validity of the data. The code identifies
a specific school, but not a specific teacher or administrator.
|
- School-level
reports are generated for all schools that have a 40 percent response
rate.
|
- The
survey is supported by the North Carolina Office of the Governor and
has a permanent place in the state’s budget. The governor’s office works
in partnership with several organizations to create, advertise and conduct
the survey, and to analyze the resulting data and create tools which
schools and communities can use to have the data inform school improvement
efforts at the local level.
|
-
In 2006 the following organizations co-sponsored the survey:
- Office
of the Governor
- North
Carolina State Board of Education
- North
Carolina Professional Teaching Standards Commission
- North
Carolina Association of Educators
- North
Carolina Department of Public Instruction
- DonorsChooseNC
- BellSouth
- Center
for Teaching Quality
- North
Carolina Business Committee for Education
|
|
|
What
We've Learned from the Survey
2006
Wake County Results |
- In 2006, Wake County
had a 76 percent response rate on the survey, much improved over the
38 percent response in 2004. All schools except four have a school-level
report. (The four schools without a report did not have a sufficient
response rate.)
|
- Some
of the key findings for Wake County include:
|
1) Leadership
was by far the most important factor identified by teachers as the
reason they would be willing to stay at their school and
in promoting student learning at their school.
|
2) One-fourth
of Wake County teachers do not believe their school has an effective
process for making group decisions and solving problems.
|
3) Thirty-four
percent of Wake County teachers spend more than ten hours per week
outside the regular school day on school-related activities.
|
4) Forty-three
percent of teachers believe they play no or only a small role in determining
the content of professional development. This is disturbing
when you take a more in-depth look at some of the data. For instance:
|
More
than 50 percent of teachers say they need additional support in
teaching special education students but only 19 percent say they
have gotten ten or more hours of professional development in this
area in the past two years. This figure has not changed since the
2004 survey.
|
5) Sixty-nine
percent of teachers in Wake County believe they play no or only a
small role in determining how their school’s budget is spent .
|
6) Fifty-six percent
of teachers believe their school improvement team provides effective
leadership at their school.
|
7) More than three-fourths
of Wake County teachers agree that their school is a good place to
work and learn.
|
Overall,
my school is a good place to teach and learn.
 |
8)
Sixty percent of Wake County teachers indicated they were planning to
stay at their school.
|
|
| |
2004
State Level Data |
- The
state-level analyses for 2006 are not yet ready for public distribution,
however, there were powerful lessons learned from the 2004 survey.
|
- Teacher
working conditions made a difference in both teacher retention and student
achievement .
Some of the specific findings include:
|
1) Teachers’ views
of the professional development, facilities and resources, and leadership
domains were all predictors of Adequate Yearly Progress and ABC status.
|
2) For every one
point increase on the survey results in the professional development
domain, schools in North Carolina were four times more likely
to make AYP, and ten times more likely to be in one of
the top school designation categories in the ABCs student accountability
program. They were three times more likely to make AYP for
every one point increase in the facilities and resources domain.
|
3) Leadership
was the single greatest predictor of whether middle schools made AYP.
For every one point increase on the survey results in the leadership
domain, middle schools were 6.7 times more likely to make
AYP. In high schools the results were even more dramatic: for every
one point increase on the leadership domain a high school was 48
times more likely to be in one of the top three ABCs performance
designations.
|
- Teacher
working conditions have “ripple effects.” All working conditions
domains are significantly correlated with each other. The good news
is that improving one area of working conditions can help to improve
other areas. Particularly strong relationships exist between leadership
and professional development, and leadership and empowerment.
|
- Teachers
view working conditions within a school similarly, regardless of their
backgrounds or experience. Teacher
perceptions of a school’s working conditions were similar regardless
of their age, years of experience, how they were prepared or whether
they are National Board Certified. This should give us confidence in
the results of the data and support them as an accurate reflection of
the teachers’ perception of working conditions within a school.
|
- Teachers
and administrators view working conditions very differently. There
was a significant difference in the responses of teachers and administrators
on every survey question. For instance, for the question “Teachers in
my school have time to plan with their colleagues during the school
day,” teachers gave an overall rating of 2.94 and the average for administrators
was 4.14. On a five point scale, this is a large difference.
|
|
| |
What
Is Being Done With the Data? |
- The
data from the North Carolina Teacher Working Conditions is an excellent
resource for informing school improvement in your community.
|
- School
districts around North Carolina have begun using the data to examine
what is going on in their schools and changing practices as a result.
Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Schools, for instance, made
changes to their school schedule for teacher meetings and professional
development as a result of the 2004 survey.
|
- The
North Carolina Principal’s Executive Program is using
the data to inform the professional development it offers administrators
from around the state.
|
- The
North Carolina Teacher Academy created a series of
workshops to help districts which are part of the Disadvantaged Student
Supplemental Funding program use the data to improve practices.
|
- If
you would like to join a Virtual Learning Community
of people from around North Carolina who are sharing ideas about how
to use the data, go to the Center
for Teaching Quality’s website.
|
| |
| For
More Information on Teacher Working Conditions |
| |
| |
| |
|
|
| |